A finnish version of rand-36-item health survey versus structured interview 8 years postoperatively

10Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim was to assess the 8-year health status after minicholecystectomy (MC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gallstone disease (GS) by using the RAND-36 Health Survey. Patients and Methods: Initially, 88 patients with symptomatic GS disease were randomized to undergo either MC (n=44) or LC (n=44). RAND-36 survey was performed 8 years postoperatively. Results: In three RAND-36 domains (social functioning, role physical, role emotional) MC procedure was significantly better than LC. In MC patients, the 8-year postoperative scores of social functioning (p<0.001), role physical (p=0.002) and role emotional (p<0.001) were significantly higher than the age- and gender -adjusted Finnish reference scores. Conclusion: The Finnish version of the RAND-36 survey can be used as a valid and reliable method for measuring the quality of life and long-term outcome of cholecystectomy patients following surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saimanen, I., Kuosmanen, V., Harju, J., Selander, T., Aspinen, S., & Eskelinen, M. (2021). A finnish version of rand-36-item health survey versus structured interview 8 years postoperatively. In Vivo, 35(2), 907–911. https://doi.org/10.21873/INVIVO.12330

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free