This review identifies empirical facts about lobbying that are generally agreed upon in the literature. It then discusses challenges to empirical research in lobbying and provides examples of empirical methods that can be employed to overcome these challenges-with an emphasis on statistical measurement, identification, and casual inference. The article then discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and effective use of the main types of data available for research in lobbying. It closes with a number of open questions for researchers in the field and avenues for future work to advance empirical research on lobbying. Copyright © 2014 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
De Figueiredo, J. M., & Richter, B. K. (2014). Advancing the empirical research on lobbying. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135308
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.