Clinical decision-making by midwives: Managing case complexity

81Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In making clinical judgements, it is argued that midwives use 'shortcuts' or heuristics based on estimated probabilities to simplify the decision-making task. Midwives (n = 30) were given simulated patient assessment situations of high and low complexity and were required to think aloud. Analysis of verbal protocols showed that subjective probability judgements (heuristics) were used more frequently in the high than low complexity case and predominated in the last quarter of the assessment period for the high complexity case. 'Representativeness' was identified more frequently in the high than in the low case, but was the dominant heuristic in both. Reports completed after each simulation suggest that heuristics based on memory for particular conditions affect decisions. It is concluded that midwives use heuristics, derived mainly from their clinical experiences, in an attempt to save cognitive effort and to facilitate reasonably accurate decisions in the decision-making process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cioffi, J., & Markham, R. (1997). Clinical decision-making by midwives: Managing case complexity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025265.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free