Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion

Abstract

Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) have worse cancer‑specific survival, disease-free survival and overall survival, and a higher mortality rate compared with patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Distinguishing DCISM from DCIS via preoperative imaging could help to predict the prognosis of patients. The present study compared the sonographic and mammographic features of patients with DCIS and DCISM. A total of 147 women (94 patients with DCIS and 53 patients with DCISM) were retrospectively included. The sonographic lesions were classified as either masses or non‑mass abnormalities. The lesions observed on mammography were classified as calcifications only, mass, asymmetry or architectural distortion. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2test, Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the presence of calcifications (P=0.038) and vascularity (P=0.025) on sonography were associated with DCISM. Furthermore, a lager distribution of calcifications was associated with a higher likelihood of DCISM (P=0.002). In conclusion, the presence of calcifications and vascularity on sonography or a lager distribution of calcifications on mammography may suggest DCISM.