Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of steerable sheaths compared with fixed-curve sheaths on the procedural outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation (RMN). Methods and Results: In this retrospective case−control study, 110 patients scheduled for AF catheter ablation were enrolled and divided into two groups. Fifty-five patients (paroxysmal, 70%) were treated with RMN-guided ablation utilizing a steerable sheath and another 55 patients (paroxysmal, 70%) were ablated with RMN using a fixed-curve sheath. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared with the fixed-curve sheath group, the steerable sheath group procedure time (111.9 ± 25.2 vs. 90.4 ± 20.7 min, p .05). Acute PVI success rates were similar between the two groups. No major or minor complications occurred in either group. Conclusion: Appropriate utilization of steerable sheath technology can improve the efficiency of AF ablation guided by RMN, primarily by reducing the total procedure and RF delivery times of right-side PVI without compromising safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luo, Q., Xie, Y., Bao, Y., Wei, Y., Lin, C., Zhang, N., … Jin, Q. (2022). Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath. Clinical Cardiology, 45(5), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23801

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free