Non-double-couple earthquakes of 1997 January in West Bohemia, Czech Republic: Evidence of tensile faulting

98Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A mixed family of double-couple (DC) and non-double-couple (non-DC) earthquakes was observed during the 1997 January earthquake swarm in West Bohemia, which is a geothermal region typical for the occurrence of earthquakes swarms. The DC and non-DC earthquakes occurred within a small area of less than 1 km3 on faults of different orientations. The stress in the area is determined from focal mechanisms and attains values (plunge/azimuth): σ1 = 33°/156°, σ2 = 48°/20°, σ3 = 23°/262°, with a shape ratio of R = 0.69 ± 0.15. The error in the stress directions (plunge/azimuth) is up to ∼5°/10°. The absolute stress values were estimated to be σ1=350 MPa, σ2 = 220 MPa and σ3 = 162 MPa. The lithostatic stress is 250 MPa. The stress analysis shows that the DC earthquakes occurred on optimally oriented faults (with high shear traction) but the non-DC earthquakes occurred on misoriented faults (with low shear traction). The percentage of the DC in earthquakes clearly correlates with the magnitude of shear traction: high/low DC is associated with high/low shear traction. This indicates that the type of faulting is probably controlled by tectonic stress and that the non-DC earthquakes are not related to pure shear faulting but may combine shear and tensile faulting. The tensile faulting is manifested by positive isotropic and compensated linear vector dipole components. The tensile faulting is conditioned by high pore fluid pressure, which was estimated to be approximately 244 MPa. The fluid pressure is less than the lithostatic stress by ∼5 MPa. The ratio of the fluid pressure to the maximum compressive stress is 0.7.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vavryčuk, V. (2002). Non-double-couple earthquakes of 1997 January in West Bohemia, Czech Republic: Evidence of tensile faulting. Geophysical Journal International, 149(2), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01654.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free