Research evaluation and Mode 2 science

Abstract

This paper analyzes the characteristics of the two main methods currently used for the evaluation of research––peer review and bibliometrics––in light of the transition from a traditional ‘mode 1’ form of scientific research to a new ‘mode 2’ form. The new mode operates within a context of application in that problems are not set within a disciplinary framework. It is carried out in non-hierarchical, heterogeneously organised forms which are essentially transient. One consequence of these changes is that mode 2 makes use of a wider range of criteria in judging quality of research.