Historical consciousness: the enigma of different paradigms

65Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To make historical consciousness beneficial for history education research we need to disentangle its multidisciplinary backgrounds so that contradictory approaches and outcomes can be avoided. The aim of this article therefore is to clarify the enigma of its different paradigms. We will discuss two interrelated paradigms: one interpreting historical consciousness as a collective phenomenon that is characteristic for modern Western society, and the other treating historical consciousness on an individual level as a cognitive-epistemological category. We will show that several misunderstandings in educational research about historical consciousness result from the conflation of both conceptualisations and its underlying paradigms. Yet, by highlighting Hans-Georg Gadamer’s notion of Wirkungsgeschichte (historical effect) we will argue that both conceptualisations are not entirely mutually exclusive. Including historically effected consciousness in the notion of historical consciousness does offer a wide range of opportunities, for history education scholars as well as history educators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grever, M., & Adriaansen, R. J. (2019). Historical consciousness: the enigma of different paradigms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(6), 814–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1652937

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free