The effect of specific sling exercises on the Functional Movement Screen score in adolescent volleyball players: A preliminary study

21Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The existing data indicate that the result of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test influences the likelihood of subsequent injury in professional athletes. Therefore, exercises increasing test scores of the FMS may be useful at various stages of sports activity. This study evaluated the effects of the NEURAC sling exercises method on the FMS test score in teenage volleyball players. The study was conducted on 15 volleyball players aged 14 years. The FMS test was performed three times interspersed with a two-month interval. Between the first and the second assessment, neither additional treatment nor training was applied, while between the second and the third assessment, the participants performed stabilisation exercises based on the NEURAC method. Training was carried out twice a week, for eight weeks. The analysis showed that between the first and the second measurement, no significant differences occurred. The use of specific sling exercises caused a significant improvement in FMS results (p < 0.01) between the first and the third, as well as the second and the third measurement. The applied stabilisation exercises based on the NEURAC method positively influenced the FMS test result in male subjects practicing volleyball. Performance of such exercises also resulted in more than 90% of the subjects having a total FMS test score > 17, which may be important in the prevention of injuries. The preliminary results indicate that this type of exercise should be included in a teenage volleyball training routine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linek, P., Saulicz, E., Myśliwiec, A., Wójtowicz, M., & Wolny, T. (2016). The effect of specific sling exercises on the Functional Movement Screen score in adolescent volleyball players: A preliminary study. Journal of Human Kinetics, 54(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free