Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage

6Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: It has commonly been assumed that deeper facelift dissection causes greater and more prolonged swelling. Objectives: In this preliminary report, the authors compare the lymphatic reconstitution after multiple techniques of rhytidectomy by means of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. All three were female, were similar in age, and exhibited similar signs and degrees of facial aging. Each woman underwent a facelift with a different technique: (1) subcutaneous dissection with superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, (2) subcutaneous dissection with SMASectomy, and (3) a "high SMAS" composite facelift. Postoperatively, 99mTc-sulfur colloid was injected into a standardized infraorbital location in each patient to compare patterns of lymphatic drainage using lymphoscintigraphy. Postoperative scans at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year were compared to the preoperative scans taken seven days prior to surgery. Results: All rhytidectomy techniques appeared to temporarily create a significant and similar degree of interruption in lymphatic drainage. There was a subtotal recovery of lymphatic pathways within three months and complete return to baseline drainage pattern after six months, regardless of surgical technique. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, it appears that the extent of facial dissection, rather than the depth, is the most significant factor in postoperative edema. © 2012 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meade, R. A., Teotia, S. S., Griffeth, L. K., & Barton, F. E. (2012). Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11430683

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free