Critical theory, historical materialism, and the ostensible end of marxism: The poverty of theory revisited

16Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay notes the extent to which poststructuralism/postmodernism have generally espoused hostility to historical materialism, surveys some representative examples of historical writing that have gravitated toward the new critical theory in opposition to Marxism, and closes with a discussion of the ironic evolution of a poststructurally inclined, anti-Marxist historiography. Counter to the prevailing ideological consensus that Marxism has been brought to its interpretive knees by a scries of analytic challenges and the political collapse of the world's ostensibly “socialist” states, this essay argues that historical materialism has lost neither its power to interpret the past nor its relevance to the contemporary intellectual terrain. © 1993, Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palmer, B. D. (1993). Critical theory, historical materialism, and the ostensible end of marxism: The poverty of theory revisited. International Review of Social History, 38(2), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000111927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free