Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth by cervical length in the first trimester of pregnancy: Comparison of two measurement methods

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Our objectives were to compare the single-line and two-line methods of cervical length measurement in the first trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate the potential value of the first trimester cervical length measured by the two methods in predicting spontaneous preterm birth. Material and methods: This was a prospective study in singleton pregnancies at 11+0 to 13+6weeks of gestation. Cervical length was measured by two methods: (i) a linear distance between the two ends of the glandular area around the endocervical canal (single-line method) and (ii) a sum of a linear distance from the internal os to the greatest cervical curvature and a linear distance from this point of the cervix to the external os (two-line method). The screening performance of the first trimester cervical length measured by the two different methods for the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery was assessed by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The areas under the ROC (AUROC) were compared by De Long test. Results: A total of 1484 consecutive singleton pregnancies were included in this study. Spontaneous preterm delivery at <37 and <32 weeks occurred in 75 cases (5.1%) and 12 cases (0.8%), respectively. The median cervical length measured by the single-line method was significantly shorter than that by the two-line method (33.5 vs 36.5 mm, p <32 weeks of gestation (36.5 vs 33.6 mm, p <32 weeks compared with the single-line method (AUROC: 0.72 vs 0.61, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feng, Q., Duan, H., Ju, X., Appiah, K., Yip, K. M., Tai, Y. yun, … Poon, L. C. (2021). Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth by cervical length in the first trimester of pregnancy: Comparison of two measurement methods. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100(7), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14138

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free