Activated T cells from draining lymph nodes and an effector site differ in their responses to TCR stimulation

  • Baumgarth N
  • Egerton M
  • Kelso A
35Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We previously showed that T cells from the mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) and lung parenchyma of influenza virus-infected mice were functionally remarkably different. Here we demonstrate that the differences in cytokine production are due to differences in the frequencies of T cells within the activated pool able to produce cytokines after TCR stimulation. FACS analysis of T cells from MLN and lung tissue demonstrated that T cells expressing any of the activation markers tested (LFA-1, CD25, CD44, CD45RB, CD49d, CD62L) always expressed high levels of CD44 and LFA-1. These double-high T cells produced >99% of all anti-CD3 mAb-induced IL-4 and IFN-gamma. Separation of T cells employing mAb against the other activation markers in combination with anti-CD44 mAb did not enable further fractionation into cytokine producers and nonproducers. Despite their similar phenotype, purified double-high lung parenchyma T cells produced markedly higher levels of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-gamma, and contained a higher frequency of cytokine producers than their MLN counterparts. Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-2 in response to TCR cross-linking was detected in double-high T cells from lung tissue but not MLN. The requirement for ERK signaling for maximal IFN-gamma synthesis could nevertheless be demonstrated in both populations by blockade with the inhibitor PD98509. Collectively, the data suggest that inductive and effector sites differ in the frequency of activated T cells able to induce ERK-2-regulated cytokine production after TCR ligation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumgarth, N., Egerton, M., & Kelso, A. (1997). Activated T cells from draining lymph nodes and an effector site differ in their responses to TCR stimulation. The Journal of Immunology, 159(3), 1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.159.3.1182

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free