The comparison of methods used for the detection of biofilm formation that cause antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus

  • Kırmusaoğlu S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: This study was performed to compare MtP, TM and CRA screening methods used for the detection of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus spp. such as Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis of which treatment can be impossible and hard, and infections such as host and indwelling device-associated infections can be recurrent. Materials and Methods: In this study 121 isolates were used and MtP method was used as gold standart method. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value parameters were calculated. Results: The sensitivity, specificity of TM and CRA methods were 97%, 100% and 87%, 94%, respectively. Conclusion: This study revealed that TM is more reliable method than CRA method. TM can be recognized as the main screening method for the identification of biofilm producer bacteria in the laboratories. By the usage of reliable biofilm detection method, wrong diagnosises and recurrent infections can be prevented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kırmusaoğlu, S. (2017). The comparison of methods used for the detection of biofilm formation that cause antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi, 9(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.21601/ortadogutipdergisi.299940

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free