A comparison between modern pollen spectra of moss cushions and Cundill pollen traps

  • Vermoere M
  • Vanhecke L
  • Waelkens M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Pollen spectra of 23 Cundill pollen traps from 23 different sampling sites in Southwest Turkey are compared with the corresponding pollen spectra of moss cushions from the same sites. The Cundill pollen traps represent the modern pollen rain data from one year whereas the moss cushions represent the pollen rain of several years. The comparative study reveals some main differences between the two pollen entrapment media. The one-year entrapment medium (pollen trap) appears to be more sensitive for local (relevė area 10 × 10 m) and regional (100 - 500 m, or a few kilometres for Olea europaea) vegetation. Pollen spectra of moss cushions are dominated by high pine pollen percentage values and hardly sense fine vegetation structures. The conclusion of this comparative modern pollen study allows to interpret fossil sediment spectra from the Near East in a more critical way. It is concluded that one should preferably sample rapidly deposited sediments for palynological analyses, as the resulting high-resolution pollen diagrams will be most informative about the former vegetation patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vermoere, M., Vanhecke, L., Waelkens, M., & Smets, E. (2000). A comparison between modern pollen spectra of moss cushions and Cundill pollen traps. Grana, 39(2–3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/001731300300045328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free