Sex Differences in Social Behavior: Are the Social Role and Evolutionary Explanations Compatible?

255Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The competing claims of two explanations of sex differences in social behavior, social role theory, and evolutionary psychology are examined. The origin and scope of research on sex differences in social behavior are outlined, and the application of social role theory is discussed. Research that is based on modern sexual selection theory is described, and whether its findings can be explained by social role theory is considered. Findings associated with social role theory are weighed against evolutionary explanations. It is concluded that evolutionary theory accounts much better for the overall pattern of sex differences and for their origins. A revolutionary approach is proposed to explain cross-cultural consistency in socialization patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Archer, J. (1996). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: Are the Social Role and Evolutionary Explanations Compatible? American Psychologist, 51(9), 909–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.909

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free