Evaluación de un módulo escolar sobre dengue y Aedes aegypti dirigido a escolares en Honduras

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of a special course on environmental health and dengue, given to primary school students and intended to promote behavioral changes in the mothers of those students that would lead to the safe handling of water, adequate disposal of trash, and control of household breeding sites of Aedes aegypti, the mosquito vector for dengue. Methods. In the period from April to November 2002 a community field trial was carried out that included four public schools in the city of Comayaguela, Honduras. Two of the schools formed the intervention group, and the two others made up the comparison or control group. The data collection activities before and after the intervention included knowledge tests for the schoolchildren and the teachers; surveys of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the students' mothers; entomological surveys (systematic checking in order to find water containers, to search for mosquito larvae) in the homes of the schoolchildren; in-depth interviews with the students' mothers; observation in the classrooms; and postintervention focus group with the teachers. Results. During the intervention period the largest epidemic of classical dengue ever in the history of Tegucigalpa, the capital of Honduras, occurred. That event prompted the Secretariat of Health to undertake large-scale control activities. In the two intervention schools there was a significant increase in the students' knowledge of the following three variables: dengue caused by a virus, life cycle of the vector, and reduction of breeding sites, which is the most effective measure for controlling the vector (P < 0.0001 for all those increases in knowledge). There were also significant increases in the knowledge of the same variables among the teachers in the intervention schools: dengue caused by a virus (P = 0.03), life cycle of the vector (P = 0.01), and reduction of breeding sites (P = 0.004). Reducing the number of breeding sites as being the best measure for controlling Aedes aegypti was the knowledge variable that showed the greatest change among the mothers in the intervention group (P = 0.02). The values for two of the entomological indices (the House index and the Breteau index) were better in the intervention group than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the Breteau index values between the two control group schools and the one intervention school where the education course was implemented more adequately than in the other intervention school. Conclusions. The application of educational interventions directed to schoolchildren, as a part of a comprehensive plan for controlling Aedes aegypti, is an effective way to raise the awareness of teachers and parents with respect to the problem of dengue, and it also helps in encouraging family members to be involved in reducing breeding sites in the home. In moving to control the dengue vector, this strategy should take into consideration the involvement not only of families but also of civic and public institutions in the community. Given our results, it appears that this approach of using a special course for schoolchildren can constitute a fundamental pillar in the strategy for integrated dengue control.