Abstract
Denis Walsh has written a striking new defense in this journal of the statisticalist (i.e.,noncausalist) position regarding the forces of evolution. I defend the causalist view against his new objections. I argue that the heart of the issue lies in the nature of nonadditive causation. Detailed consideration of that turns out to defuse Walsh's 'description-dependence' critique of causalism. Nevertheless, the critique does suggest a basis for reconciliation between the two competing views. Copyright 2010 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Robert, N. (2010). Walsh on causes and evolution. Philosophy of Science, 77(3), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1086/652965
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.