Nitrogen metabolism of two contrasting poplar species during acclimation to limiting nitrogen availability

207Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To investigate N metabolism of two contrasting Populus species in acclimation to low N availability, saplings of slow-growing species (Populus popularis, Pp) and a fast-growing species (Populus alba × Populus glandulosa, Pg) were exposed to 10, 100, or 1000 μM NH4NO 3. Despite greater root biomass and fine root surface area in Pp, lower net infuxes of NH4+ and NO3- at the root surface were detected in Pp compared to those in Pg, corresponding well to lower NH4+ and NO3- content and total N concentration in Pp roots. Meanwhile, higher stable N isotope composition (δ15N) in roots and stronger responsiveness of transcriptional regulation of 18 genes involved in N metabolism were found in roots and leaves of Pp compared to those of Pg. These results indicate that the N metabolism of Pp is more sensitive to decreasing N availability than that of Pg. In both species, low N treatments decreased net infuxes of NH 4+ and NO3-, root NH 4+ and foliar NO3- content, root NR activities, total N concentration in roots and leaves, and transcript levels of most ammonium (AMTs) and nitrate (NRTs) transporter genes in leaves and genes involved in N assimilation in roots and leaves. Low N availability increased fine root surface area, foliar starch concentration, δ15N in roots and leaves, and transcript abundance of several AMTs (e.g. AMT1;2) and NRTs (e.g. NRT1;2 and NRT2;4B) in roots of both species. These data indicate that poplar species slow down processes of N acquisition and assimilation in acclimation to limiting N supply. © The Author 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luo, J., Li, H., Liu, T., Polle, A., Peng, C., & Luo, Z. B. (2013). Nitrogen metabolism of two contrasting poplar species during acclimation to limiting nitrogen availability. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(14), 4207–4224. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free