Sacrifice, metaphor, and evolution: Towards a cognitive linguistic theology of sacrifice

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article lays the groundwork for articulating a Christian theology of sacrifice within the framework of cognitive linguistics. I demonstrate the affinity and potential for mutual enrichment between three disparate fields of discourse. Beginning with Jonathan Klawans's methodological proposals for understanding sacrifice as a meaningful phenomenon for those who engage(d) in it, I suggest that the double-scope conceptual blending described by Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner provides a helpful resource for Klawans to clarify his thought and answer objections to his proposals. Fauconnier and Turner's account of double-scope blends is set within an evolutionary account of human development and is the condition of possibility for language, art, science, and religion. I then put Fauconnier and Turner into dialogue with Sarah Coakley's recent attempts to locate sacrifice within the evolutionary spectrum, and suggest that they provide a more helpful theory of language than Chomsky's purely formal account.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schlesinger, E. R. (2018). Sacrifice, metaphor, and evolution: Towards a cognitive linguistic theology of sacrifice. Open Theology, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free