Laparoscopic resection with transcolonic specimen extraction for ileocaecal Crohn's disease

30Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease can be performed entirely laparoscopically. However, an incision is needed for specimen extraction. This prospective observational study assessed the feasibility of endoscopic transcolonic specimen removal. Methods: Endoscopic specimen removal was attempted in a consecutive series often patients scheduled for laparoscopic ileocolic resection. Primary outcomes were feasibility, operating time, reoperation rate, pain scores, morphine requirement and hospital stay. To assess applicability, outcomes were compared with previous data from patients who had laparoscopically assisted operations. Results: Transcolonic removal was successful in eight of ten patients; it was considered not feasible in two patients because the inflammatory mass was too large (7-8 cm). Median operating time was 208 min and median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. After surgery two patients developed an intra-abdominal abscess, drained laparoscopically or percutaneously, and one patient had another sitespecific infection. The operation took longer than conventional laparoscopy, with no benefits perceived by patients in terms of cosmesis or body image. Conclusion: Transcolonic removal of the specimen in ileocolic Crohn's disease is feasible in the absence of a large inflammatory mass but infection may be a problem. It is unclear whether the technique offers benefit compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eshuis, E. J., Voermans, R. P., Stokkers, P. C. F., Van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Fockens, P., & Bemelman, W. A. (2010). Laparoscopic resection with transcolonic specimen extraction for ileocaecal Crohn’s disease. In British Journal of Surgery (Vol. 97, pp. 569–574). https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6932

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free