Comparison of outcomes in severely injured patients between a South Korean trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The South Korean government recently developed a master plan for establishing a national trauma system based on the implementation of regional trauma centers. We aimed to compare outcomes between severely injured patients treated at a recently established South Korean trauma center and matched patients treated in American level-1 trauma centers. Methods: Two cohorts were selected from an institutional trauma database at Ajou University Medical Center (AUMC) and the American National Trauma Data Bank. Adult patients with an Injury Severity Score of ≥9 were included. Patients were matched based on covariates that affect mortality, using 1:1 propensity score matching. We compared outcomes between the two datasets and performed survival analyses. Results: We created 1,451 and 2,103 matched pairs for the pre-trauma center and post-trauma center periods, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the institutional trauma database pre-trauma center period compared with the American National Trauma Data Bank (11.6% versus 8.1%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jung, K., Matsumoto, S., Smith, A., Hwang, K., Lee, J. C. J., & Coimbra, R. (2018). Comparison of outcomes in severely injured patients between a South Korean trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States. Surgery (United States), 164(3), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free