Eosinophilia among returning travelers: A practical approach

53Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Eosinophilia is not uncommon among returning travelers; however, the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approach in travelers, as opposed to immigrants and refugees, is not clearly established. This was a retrospective case series. All returning travelers from developing countries presenting at the post-travel clinic with eosinophilia (≥ 500 cells/mcl) during 1994-2006 were evaluated. Data were compared with other referrals to the post-travel clinic and with a random sample of a pre-travel clinic. Of the 955 returning travelers evaluated during the study period, 82 (8.6%) had eosinophilia, and 44 (4.4%) were diagnosed with schistosomiasis. Another 38 (4.2%) cases presented with non-schistosomal eosinophilia (NSE), among whom a definite parasitologic diagnosis was achieved in only 23.7%. However, an empiric course of albendazole led to a clinical improvement in 90% of NSE cases. Helminthic disease probably accounts for the majority of cases of post-travel eosinophilia. Empiric albendazole therapy should be offered to undiagnosed NSE patients. Copyright © 2008 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meltzer, E., Percik, R., Shatzkes, J., Sidi, Y., & Schwartz, E. (2008). Eosinophilia among returning travelers: A practical approach. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 78(5), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2008.78.702

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free