High-risk screening and detection of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in two prefectures of China: a drug susceptibility surveillance-based secondary data analysis

Abstract

Background: In China, less than one-fifth of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases are detected. MDR-TB screening is conducted amongst the following five high-risk groups of TB patients: chronic cases, close contacts of MDR-TB patients, patients with treatment failure, relapsed and returned patients, and smear-positive patients at the end of the third month of initial treatment. Objective: To estimate the possibility of detecting MDR-TB cases if only the high-risk screening strategy is applied in China. Methods: A secondary analysis was applied to the surveillance-based longitudinal data of all sputum smear-positive TB patients in Prefecture E and Prefecture W of China from 2013 to 2015. The population attributable risk (PAR) was estimated using odds ratios for five risk factors/predictors and exposure proportions amongst all MDR-TB cases. Results: A total of 3513 TB patients (2807 from Prefecture E and 706 from Prefecture W) were included. Males accounted for 77.91% (2737/3513) of the patients. The average age was 52.5 ± 20.0 years old. Overall, 40.34% (71/176) of MDR-TB patients were from the five high-risk groups during the three-year study period. The detected proportion of MDR-TB cases using the high-risk screening strategy was significantly higher in Prefecture E than in Prefecture W. The PAR% for all five risk factors/predictors was 43.4% (95% CI: 24.6–61.7%), 49.9% (95% CI: 31.3–67.0%), and 30.3% (95% CI: 12.9–50.1%) in Prefecture E and 36.6% (95% CI: 10.4–64.5%), 13.3% (95% CI: −1.7–39.7%), and −82.5% (95% CI: −117.5–−11.2%) in Prefecture W in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. The PAR% for the five specific risk factors/predictors ranged from 0.4% (95% CI: −0.2–4.8%) to 21.0% (95% CI: 13.1–30.0%) in these two prefectures. Conclusion: In general, a high-risk screening strategy would miss more than half of the MDR-TB patients because they do not belong to the five high-risk groups.