An academic response to Basel 3.5

155Citations
Citations of this article
150Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent crises in the financial industry have shown weaknesses in the modeling of Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs). Relatively minor model changes may lead to substantial changes in the RWA numbers. Similar problems are encountered in the Value-at-Risk (VaR)-aggregation of risks. In this article, we highlight some of the underlying issues, both methodologically, as well as through examples. In particular, we frame this discussion in the context of two recent regulatory documents we refer to as Basel 3.5.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Embrechts, P., Puccetti, G., Rüschendorf, L., Wang, R., & Beleraj, A. (2014). An academic response to Basel 3.5. Risks, 2(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks2010025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free