Clinical comparative analysis of neonatal scalp vein and axillary vein catheterization

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of axillary vein catheterization (AVC) and scalp vein catheterization (SVC) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Design: Retrospective study Setting: The Central Hospital of Xinxiang, China Subjects: One hundred and fifteen cases from the NICU were enrolled from June 2012 to June 2013. Interventions: Fifty-four patients underwent AVC and 61 underwent SVC. Main outcome measure(s): Catheter-related bloodstream infection, catheter obstruction, ectopia, phlebitis, and local leaking Results: No significant difference between groups was observed for catheter related bloodstream infection (SVC: 4.4%, AVC: 3.7%, p = 0.56) and catheter obstruction (9.8% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.87) between the two catheterization methods. However, the rate of catheter ectopia, phlebitis and leaking in SVC were significantly higher than those for AVC (18.0% Vs. 3.7%, p = 0.02,18.0% Vs 3.7%, p = 0.02 and 16.4% Vs. 3.7%, p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: Although both SVC and AVC could be the choice for intravenous infusion in the NICU, AVC was safer than SVC in newborn infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, H. X., Liu, F., Zhang, W. X., Zhao, B. J., Wang, Y., & Wang, P. (2016). Clinical comparative analysis of neonatal scalp vein and axillary vein catheterization. Kuwait Medical Journal, 48(4), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2015.174

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free