Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of axillary vein catheterization (AVC) and scalp vein catheterization (SVC) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Design: Retrospective study Setting: The Central Hospital of Xinxiang, China Subjects: One hundred and fifteen cases from the NICU were enrolled from June 2012 to June 2013. Interventions: Fifty-four patients underwent AVC and 61 underwent SVC. Main outcome measure(s): Catheter-related bloodstream infection, catheter obstruction, ectopia, phlebitis, and local leaking Results: No significant difference between groups was observed for catheter related bloodstream infection (SVC: 4.4%, AVC: 3.7%, p = 0.56) and catheter obstruction (9.8% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.87) between the two catheterization methods. However, the rate of catheter ectopia, phlebitis and leaking in SVC were significantly higher than those for AVC (18.0% Vs. 3.7%, p = 0.02,18.0% Vs 3.7%, p = 0.02 and 16.4% Vs. 3.7%, p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: Although both SVC and AVC could be the choice for intravenous infusion in the NICU, AVC was safer than SVC in newborn infants.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Li, H. X., Liu, F., Zhang, W. X., Zhao, B. J., Wang, Y., & Wang, P. (2016). Clinical comparative analysis of neonatal scalp vein and axillary vein catheterization. Kuwait Medical Journal, 48(4), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2015.174
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.