Influence of the urethral pressure transducer in measuring Valsalva leak point pressure in women undergoing multichannel urodynamic testing

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: To determine if the air-charged urethral sensor balloon currently used in urodynamic testing (UDS) significantly impacts Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) measurements. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of women undergoing UDS at an academic institution. VLPPs were obtained at 150 mL and urodynamic capacity with and without the urethral pressure sensor in the urethra. VLPP measurements were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Median and interquartile range are presented. Results: Sixty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 53 were included in the primary analysis. The mean age of the subjects was 56.2 ± 12.1 years. Nine patients (16%) solely leaked when the balloon was not present in the urethra either with cough or during VLPP measurement. At both 150 mL and urodynamic capacity, when VLPP testing was performed, there was a significant difference (cmH2O) between the control and intervention values, (76.2 [55.0, 97.0] vs 68.8 [46.3, 93.3], P =.0012; 79.3 [53, 96.5] vs 72.5 [50.8, 92.3], P =.04). There was also a statistically significant difference between the control and intervention values for the lowest leak value at 150 mL and capacity (70.5 [51, 94.5] vs 60.0 [40, 88] P =.002; 73.5 [49.5, 91.5] vs 61 [45, 88], P =.017). Conclusions: The higher VLPPs obtained with the urethral balloon in place indicate that the balloon may be the cause of falsely elevated VLPPs during urodynamic testing. Additionally, the balloon may mask a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence in some patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panza, J., Hill, B., Heft, J., & Biller, D. (2020). Influence of the urethral pressure transducer in measuring Valsalva leak point pressure in women undergoing multichannel urodynamic testing. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 39(2), 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free