Abstract
Participatory action research (PAR) is a methodological approach that seeks to maximize the participation of people whose lives it researches. It is underpinned by an ethical concern to research "with" people, rather than "on" people. However, this ethical approach to research is often, paradoxically, problematized by universities' research ethics committees (RECs). This article explores one site of tension between PAR and RECs- The requirement for anonymity for below 18-year-olds. It explores this tension by exploring a case study of a peer- To-peer research project undertaken by young women in East London, and using our own experiences and perspectives, it argues that anonymity can be unjust, disempowering, and unnecessary, and can reduce "pride." Without wanting to develop specific recommendations, given the limited scope of our case study, this article uses firsthand experiences to add weight to the broader discussions calling for a critical rethink of REC guidelines.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Yanar, Z. M., Fazli, M., Rahman, J., & Farthing, R. (2016). Research ethics committees and participatory action research with young People: The Politics of Voice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616650114
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.