Measurement of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability with T 1 -Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Brain Tumors: A Comparative Study with Two Different Algorithms

  • Bergamino M
  • Saitta L
  • Barletta L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of measuring different permeability parameters with T 1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in order to investigate the blood brain-barrier permeability associated with different brain tumors. The Patlak algorithm and the extended Tofts-Kety model were used to this aim. Twenty-five adult patients with tumors of different histological grades were enrolled in this study. MRI examinations were performed at 1.5 T. Multiflip angle, fast low-angle shot, and axial 3D T 1 -weighted images were acquired to calculate T 1 maps, followed by a DCE acquisition. A region of interest was placed within the tumor of each patient to calculate the mean value of different permeability parameters. Differences in permeability measurements were found between different tumor grades, with higher histological grades characterized by higher permeability values. A significant difference in transfer constant ( K t r a n s ) values was found between the two methods on high-grade tumors; however, both techniques revealed a significant correlation between the histological grade of tumors and their K t r a n s values. Our results suggest that DCE acquisition is feasible in patients with brain tumors and that K t r a n s maps can be easily obtained by these two algorithms, even if the theoretical model adopted could affect the final results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergamino, M., Saitta, L., Barletta, L., Bonzano, L., Mancardi, G. L., Castellan, L., … Roccatagliata, L. (2013). Measurement of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability with T 1 -Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Brain Tumors: A Comparative Study with Two Different Algorithms. ISRN Neuroscience, 2013, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/905279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free