Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes

30Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Metagenomic binning is a culture-free approach that facilitates the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes by grouping genomic fragments. However, there remains a lack of a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the performance of metagenomic binning tools across various combinations of data types and binning modes. In this study, we benchmark 13 metagenomic binning tools using short-read, long-read, and hybrid data under co-assembly, single-sample, and multi-sample binning, respectively. The benchmark results demonstrate that multi-sample binning exhibits optimal performance across short-read, long-read, and hybrid data. Moreover, multi-sample binning outperforms other binning modes in identifying potential antibiotic resistance gene hosts and near-complete strains containing potential biosynthetic gene clusters across diverse data types. This study also recommends three efficient binners across all data-binning combinations, as well as high-performance binners for each combination.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, H., Wang, Z., & Zhu, S. (2025). Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes. Nature Communications , 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57957-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free