Bilaterally absent pupillary responses: Not always a bad sign

5Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pupillary responses are a simple test commonly used as a predictor of outcome after severe brain injury. It is also common for clinicians to associate bilaterally absent pupillary responses with very poor prognosis. We report a series of cases of severely brain injured children with bilaterally absent pupillary responses who had favourable outcomes. From a group of 89 patients with brain injury, 32 had bilaterally absent pupillary responses and six (four with traumatic brain injury and two with infective brain injury) subsequently had favourable outcomes. This represents 18.8% of patients and should be a reminder to clinicians that the clinical sign of bilaterally absent pupillary responses is not always associated with a hopeless outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carter, B. G., Butt, W., & Taylor, A. (2007). Bilaterally absent pupillary responses: Not always a bad sign. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 35(6), 984–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0703500623

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free