In the 1960s the American New Archaeology recommended a logical empiricist, positivist research programme. But in philosophy positivism was by then already out of date. Also in archaeology it was much criticized, and some post-processualists ended up in total relativism. It has been maintained that we cannot attain any objective truth about the past, but have to form a subjective picture of it. But archaeology does not have to choose between positivism and relativism. A new philosphical school, theoretical realism, allows archaeologists to speak of the prehistoric past as a reality, not as a construction or a fiction. The research strategy observed by all good archaeologists since the beginning of our science in the 1830s is good and will lead to thrustworthy results.
CITATION STYLE
Malmer, M. P. (1993). On Theoretical Realism in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 1(1), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.37718/csa.1993.13
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.