ESPINA: A tool for the automated segmentation and counting of synapses in large stacks of electron microscopy images

61Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The synapses in the cerebral cortex can be classified into two main types, Gray's type I and type II, which correspond to asymmetric (mostly glutamatergic excitatory) and symmetric (inhibitory GABAergic) synapses, respectively. Hence, the quantification and identification of their different types and the proportions in which they are found, is extraordinarily important in terms of brain function. The ideal approach to calculate the number of synapses per unit volume is to analyze 3D samples reconstructed from serial sections. However, obtaining serial sections by transmission electron microscopy is an extremely time consuming and technically demanding task. Using focused ion beam/scanning electron microscope microscopy, we recently showed that virtually all synapses can be accurately identified as asymmetric or symmetric synapses when they are visualized, reconstructed, and quantified from large 3D tissue samples obtained in an automated manner. Nevertheless, the analysis, segmentation, and quantification of synapses is still a labor intensive procedure. Thus, novel solutions are currently necessary to deal with the large volume of data that is being generated by automated 3D electron microscopy. Accordingly, we have developed ESPINA, a software tool that performs the automated segmentation and counting of synapses in a reconstructed 3D volume of the cerebral cortex, and that greatly facilitates and accelerates these processes. © 2011 Morales, Alonso-Nanclares, Rodríguez, DeFelipe, Rodríguezand Merchán-Pérez.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morales, J., Alonso-Nanclares, L., Rodríguez, J. R., DeFelipe, J., Rodríguez, Á., & Merchán-Pérez, Á. (2011). ESPINA: A tool for the automated segmentation and counting of synapses in large stacks of electron microscopy images. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, (MARCH), 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2011.00018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free