PROJECT RESILIENCE DIMENSIONS RANKING FROM MALAYSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES: A DELPHI STUDY

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prior studies on resilience focused on parameters that influence the recovery following a disaster. Few scholars have examined project resilience determinants as a strategy for achieving sustainable growth and advancement. Using a Delphi method with two rounds, this study aims to discover the factors regarded as essential for project resilience from Malaysian and international perspectives. Using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, the consistency of the ranking of eight dimensions was then evaluated. The importance of the eight dimensions indicated by the Delphi technique is as follows: (1) Leadership, (2) Project Agility, (3) Interpersonal Skill, (4) Team Trust, (5) Risk Management and Vulnerability, (6) Perception and Awareness, (7) Persistence and Crisis Preparedness, and (8) Emotional Intelligence. The relationship between the previously listed dimensions and project resilience is discussed. The authors suggest future scholars conduct other forms of quantitative and mixed-method research based on the eight dimensions identified for a deeper understanding of the interplay between the dimensions and also to decrease potential bias caused by triangulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wen, K. C., Rasli, A., Tee, M., Elsie, N., Khairudin, & Abas, I. H. (2023). PROJECT RESILIENCE DIMENSIONS RANKING FROM MALAYSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES: A DELPHI STUDY. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 18(11), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2023.11.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free