Analisis Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Permainan Tebak Kata dalam Pembelajaran Mufradat di kelas 3 SMP MBS AR Fachruddin Yogyakarta

  • Desi Hidayati S
  • Hafidah
  • Qosim M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Laporan ini membahas tentang analisis validitas instrument kuesioner permainan tebak kata dalam pembelajaran mufradat di kelas 3 SMP MBS AR Fachruddin Yogyakarta. Metode yang digunakan yaitu  metode penelitian kuantitatif. Metode kuantitatif merupakan suatu cara yang digunakan untuk menjawab masalah penelitian yang berkaitan dengan data berupa angka dan program statistik. Hasil penelitian dari analisis validitas kuesioner permainan tebak kata menunjukkan bahwa setiap item pernyataan yang tercantum di dalamnya sudah valid berdasarkan perbandingan r hitung dan r table dengan menggunakan bantuan program SPSS. Maka Kuesioner tersebut dapat mengukur apa yang bisa diukur mengenai permainan tebak kata dalam pembelajaran mufrodat di kelas 3 SMP MBS AR Fachruddin Yogyakarta. Write This report discusses the validity analysis of the word guessing game questionnaire instrument in mufradat learning in class 3 of SMP MBS AR Fachruddin Yogyakarta. The method used is a quantitative research method. Quantitative methods are a method used to answer research problems related to data in the form of numbers and statistical programs. The research results from the validity analysis of the word guessing game questionnaire show that each statement item listed in it is valid based on a comparison of r count and r table using the help of the SPSS program. So the questionnaire can measure what can be measured regarding word guessing games in mufrodat learning in class 3 of SMP MBS AR Fachruddin Yogyakarta.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desi Hidayati, S., Hafidah, Qosim, M. N., & Makruf, I. (2023). Analisis Validitas Instrumen Kuesioner Permainan Tebak Kata dalam Pembelajaran Mufradat di kelas 3 SMP MBS AR Fachruddin Yogyakarta. Rayah Al-Islam, 7(3), 1377–1381. https://doi.org/10.37274/rais.v7i3.844

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free