A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DRUG INTERACTION AND SIDE-EFFECT OF DRUG FOR TREATMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS: A REVIEW

  • Yadav M
  • Saraswat N
  • Wal P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this review paper is to examine diabetes and via the modifying drugs treatment how to improve the patient condition and related risks. The review mentions the different types of comparative drugs which are useful for diagnosis or prevention of diabetes. Treatment modification can play a major role in the decreasing the diabetic patients. In India, a concerning 1-5% by population affected by diabetes or related difficulty. So there is required to use medications to cure the disease. If a patient suffers from diabetes used anti-diabetic drugs. These drugs are recommended for lowering the blood glucose levels. Metformin, Acarbose, thiazolidinedione etc. Most of the drugs are administered via orally so that called oral hypoglycemic or oral antihyperglycemic agents. Present days for treatment of diabetes available, different classes of anti-diabetic drugs and their choice depending on the patient diabetic type or the condition, age as well as other factors. Type 1 diabetes mainly caused by deficiency of insulin secretion the body. Researcher around the world focused on oral hypoglycemic agents and presents various types of comparative study to control the diabetes mellitus. The present review summarizes the comparative study of anti-diabetic drugs for the treatment of diabetes. This review article has shown a comparative study of drugs which are metformin more popular drug treatment of diabetes and they have the less side effect or higher efficacy, mention in the recently published articles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yadav, M., Saraswat, N., Wal, P., Rai, A. K., & Singh, D. (2018). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DRUG INTERACTION AND SIDE-EFFECT OF DRUG FOR TREATMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS: A REVIEW. International Research Journal Of Pharmacy, 9(6), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.7897/2230-8407.09682

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free