Clinical interpretation of peripheral pulse oximeters labeled “not for medical use”

11Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to clarify limitations of off-label use for low cost nonmedical use (NMU) pulse oximeters by primary care providers. These devices are widely marketed over the Internet and in drugstores but are not intended for medical use or reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our study compared oxygen saturation (SpO2) in patients from 1 medical use (MU) pulse oximeter to 8 NMU pulse oximeters. Measured arterial oxygenation (SaO2) was compared with SpO2 when available. In patients who were normoxic (SpO2 ≥90%), all oximeters exhibited similar readings. This finding suggests that NMU pulse oximeters may be able to rule out hypoxemia in clinical settings.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hudson, A. J., Benjamin, J., Jardeleza, T., Bergstrom, C., Cronin, W., Mendoza, M., & Schultheis, L. (2018). Clinical interpretation of peripheral pulse oximeters labeled “not for medical use.” Annals of Family Medicine, 16(6), 552–554. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free