RDF querying: Language constructs and evaluation methods compared

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text


This article is firstly an introduction into query languages for the Semantic Web, secondly an in-depth comparison of the languages introduced. Only RDF query languages are considered because, as of the writing of this paper, query languages for other Semantic Web data modeling formalisms, especially OWL, are still an open research issue, and only a very small number of, furthermore incomplete, proposals for querying Semantic Web data modeled after other formalisms than RDF exist. The limitation to a few RDF query languages is motivated both by the objective of an in-depth comparison of the languages addressed and by space limitations. During the three years before the writing of this article, more than three dozen proposals for RDF query languages have been published! Not only such a large number, but also the often immature nature of the proposals makes the focus on few, but representative languages a necessary condition for a non-trivial comparison. For this article, the following RDF query languages have been, admittedly subjectively, selected: Firstly, the "relational" or "pattern-based" query languages SPARQL, RQL, TRIPLE, and Xcerpt; secondly the reactive rule query language Algae; thirdly and last the "navigational access" query language Versa. Although subjective, this choice is arguably a good coverage of the diverse language paradigms considered for querying RDF data. It is the authors' hope and expectation, that this comparison will motivate and trigger further similar studies, thus completing the present article and overcoming its limitation. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.




Furche, T., Linse, B., Bry, F., Plexousakis, D., & Gottlob, G. (2006). RDF querying: Language constructs and evaluation methods compared. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4126 LNCS, pp. 1–52). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11837787_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free