Simplicity, language-dependency and the best system account of laws

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is often said that the best system account of laws (BSA) needs supplementing with a theory of perfectly natural properties. The 'strength' and 'simplicity' of a system is language-relative and without a fixed vocabulary it is impossible to compare rival systems. Recently a number of philosophers have attempted to reformulate the BSA in an effort to avoid commitment to natural properties. I assess these proposals and argue that they are problematic as they stand. Nonetheless, I agree with their aim, and show that if simplicity is interpreted as 'compression', algorithmic information theory provides a framework for system comparison without the need for natural properties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wheeler, B. (2016). Simplicity, language-dependency and the best system account of laws. Theoria (Spain), 31(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.14558

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free