The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes of science shows: a systematic review

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Science shows are used in a wide range of settings worldwide to communicate science. Many resources are invested in science shows, however there is little research into what a modern science show is or what it aims to achieve. This systematic review seeks to carve out the landscape of science shows by reviewing their aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes. Using Scopus and Web of Science, we reviewed the English peer-reviewed science show literature over the period 2014–2024. Although thirty-one science performance studies were identified, only five of these referred to a science show, for inclusion in the final analysis. Within these five studies there was great variation in terms of the aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes, hampering intercomparisons. Nevertheless, the review presents a picture of the modern science show as a very versatile form of live performance, which can be tailored to many audiences in a range of different settings. It also highlights the difficulty in drawing conclusions from such a heterogeneous sample, and the need for further research on science shows to support the continued development of this field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duggan, R., Kranjc Horvat, A., Schmeling, S., & van Sebille, E. (2025). The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes of science shows: a systematic review. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 15(4), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2025.2493373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free