Sensitivity and Reliability of Halothane-anaesthetized Microminipigs to Assess Risk of Drug-induced Long QT Syndrome

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using moxifloxacin and terfenadine, which are known to induce benign and malignant QT interval prolongation, respectively, we analysed whether halothane-anaesthetized microminipigs are an appropriate model for assessing the risk of drug-induced long QT syndrome. Moxifloxacin (0.03, 0.3 and 3 mg/kg) and terfenadine (0.03, 0.3 and 3 mg/kg) were intravenously infused over 10 min. with a pause of 20 min. to the halothane-anaesthetized microminipigs (n = 4 for each drug). Moxifloxacin decreased the heart rate, whereas it increased the blood pressure in a dose-related manner. It also prolonged the PR interval and QT/QTc in a dose-related manner without altering the QRS width. Terfenadine decreased the heart rate and blood pressure, whereas it prolonged the PR interval, QRS width and QT/QTc in a dose-related manner. Terfenadine significantly prolonged the beat-to-beat variability of QT interval reflecting its pro-arrhythmic potential, which was not observed with moxifloxacin. The peak plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin and terfenadine after doses of 3 mg/kg were 4.81 and 10.15 μg/mL, respectively, which were both 1.5 times less in microminipigs than those previously reported in dogs. These results indicate that halothane-anaesthetized microminipigs would be useful for detecting drug-induced cardiovascular responses as well as differentiating benign from malignant QT interval prolongation like dogs, although there may be some differences in pharmacokinetic profile between these animals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, X., Wada, T., Nakamura, Y., Matsukura, S., Izumi-Nakaseko, H., Ando, K., … Sugiyama, A. (2017). Sensitivity and Reliability of Halothane-anaesthetized Microminipigs to Assess Risk of Drug-induced Long QT Syndrome. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 121(6), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12838

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free