Comparison of a positive deviance inquiry with a case-control study to identify factors associated with nutritional status among Agfan refugee children in Pakistan

13Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the positive deviance (PD) approach in Save the Children's field guide with a case-control study (CCS) to identify behaviors associated with good nutritional status in Afghan refugee children 6 to 24 months of age in the Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP), Pakistan. The positive deviance inquiry (PDI), utilizing observations and interviews with mothers, fathers, and secondary caregivers in eight households, identified 12 feeding, caring, and health-seeking behaviors that were not widely practiced. The CCS, using the same selection criteria and content as the PDI with 50 mother-child pairs not in the PDI, yielded six significant associations with good nutritional status. Both the PDI and CCS detected feeding behaviors. The PDI alone identified complex phenomena (active feeding and maternal affect). The CCS alone confirmed the beneficial use of health services. The PD approach was an affordable, participatory, and valid method to identify feeding behaviors and other factors associated with good nutrition in this context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lapping, K., Schroeder, D., Marsh, D. R., Albalak, R., & Jabarkhil, M. Z. (2002). Comparison of a positive deviance inquiry with a case-control study to identify factors associated with nutritional status among Agfan refugee children in Pakistan. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 23(4 SUPP), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265020234s205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free