From Corpuscles to Elements: Chemical Ontologies from Van Helmont to Lavoisier

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

From a philosophical point of view, one of the more significant changes in chemical ontology from the late sixteenth to the mid-eighteenth century is the shift from a vitalistic conception of fundamental corpuscles, to a mechanistic atomism, to an operational notion of chemical elements. This essay proposes to discuss some of the key figures in this ontological shift, focusing on the ideas of van Helmont, Sennert, Gassendi, Boyle, and Lavoisier. The essay examines the relationship between the work of late sixteenth century chymists and that of the mechanistic atomists to illustrate the fact that the atomistic framework of the late seventeenth century was intimately dependent upon the earlier work of vitalistic corpuscularian alchemists and chymists. In addition to tracing the influences of vitalistic corpuscularianism on the shift to a mechanistic atomistic ontology, this essay also establishes historical antecedents, in the work of Sennert and Boyle, for Lavoisier’s operational and analytical definition of chemical elements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banchetti-Robino, M. P. (2015). From Corpuscles to Elements: Chemical Ontologies from Van Helmont to Lavoisier. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 306, pp. 141–154). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9364-3_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free