Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Primary and Secondary Prevention of SCD—What We Still Don′ t Know

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are the cornerstone of primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) all around the globe. In almost 40 years of technological advances and multiple clinical trials, there has been a continuous increase in the implantation rate. The purpose of this review is to highlight the grey areas related to actual ICD recommendations, focusing specifically on the primary prevention of SCD. We will discuss the still-existing controversies strongly reflected in the differences between the international guidelines regarding ICD indication class in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and also address the question of early implantation after myocardial infarction in the absence of clear protocols for patients at high risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. Correlating the insufficient data in the literature for 40-day waiting times with the increased risk of SCD in the first month after myocardial infarction, we review the pros and cons of early ICD implantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ursaru, A. M., Petris, A. O., Costache, I. I., Nicolae, A., Crisan, A., & Tesloianu, N. D. (2022, April 1). Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Primary and Secondary Prevention of SCD—What We Still Don′ t Know. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9040120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free