This article provides a critical review of Rawls’ effort in Political Liberalism to construct a political theory of justice compatible with the fact of reasonable pluralism. Particular attention is given to the ‘idea of public reason’ and political liberalism’s liberal neutrality. It is argued that because of its liberal neutrality, political liberalism would preclude people from endorsing at least some reasonable comprehensive views and, therefore, as a theory it lacks the necessary stability required to be as successful as Rawls claims.
CITATION STYLE
Patterson, R. (2004). Reviewing Public Reason: A Critique of Rawls’ Political Liberalism and the Idea of Public Reason. Deakin Law Review, 9(2), 715–729. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2004vol9no2art260
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.