Is remission of depressive symptoms in primary care a realistic goal? A meta-analysis

27Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A primary goal of acute treatment for depression is clinical remission of symptoms. Most meta-analyses of remission rates involve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using patients from psychiatric settings, but most depressed patients are treated in primary care. The goal of this study was to determine remission rates obtained in RCTs of treatment interventions for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) conducted in primary care settings. Methods: Potentially relevant studies were identified using computerized and manual search strategies up to May 2003. Criteria for inclusion included published RCTs with a clear definition of remission using established outcome measures. Results: A total of 13 studies (N = 3202 patients) meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Overall remission rates for active interventions ranged between 50% and 67%, compared to 32% for pill placebo conditions and 35% for usual care conditions. Conclusions: Remission rates in primary care studies of depression are at least as high as for those in psychiatric settings. It is a realistic goal for family physicians to target remission of symptoms as an optimal outcome for treatment of depression. © 2004 Dawson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dawson, M. Y., Michalak, E. E., Waraich, P., Anderson, J. E., & Lam, R. W. (2004). Is remission of depressive symptoms in primary care a realistic goal? A meta-analysis. BMC Family Practice, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-5-19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free