Inheriting Marx daniel bensaïd, ernst Bloch and the discordance of time

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay traces a Marxist notion of cultural heritage drawing on the work of twentieth-century thinkers Daniel Bensaïd and Ernst Bloch. Both authors, indeed, address the act of inheriting as a way of rethinking Marxism beyond determinist and teleological concepts of history. In particular, Bensaïd’s 1995 Marx for Our Times and a 1972 essay on cultural heritage by Ernst Bloch reimagine the handing-on of cultural inheritance as the political reactivation of untimely and non-synchronous survivals of past social formations. For this reason, the heritage of Marx conveyed by these authors does not result in a nostalgic preservation of the past but in reviving unrealised possibilities of social transformation. In a comparative reading of Bensaïd and Bloch, the act of ‘inheriting Marx’ analysed in this essay hence formulates a de-commodifying conception of cultural heritage set against the violence of capital.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menozzi, F. (2020). Inheriting Marx daniel bensaïd, ernst Bloch and the discordance of time. Historical Materialism. Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001803

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free