Measuring What Matters in Radiology: A Guide to Selecting, Implementing, and Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized, validated instruments that measure how patients feel and function, collected directly from the patient. Traditionally, key metrics in radiology include technical aspects such as image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy. However, medical imaging and image-guided therapies shape patient experience in informational, emotional, physical, and logistical domains that are rarely measured. Failing to capture this information is an important gap in radiology research and practice today that needs to be addressed. This review synthesizes the science of PROMs through a radiology lens: what PROMs are; why PROMs are relevant to diagnostic imaging and interventional practice; how to select and interpret PROMs responsibly, with explicit attention to bias, conflicts of interest, and minimal important differences; and how to implement PROMs pragmatically using contemporary digital workflows. This article highlights radiology-specific frameworks for patient-centred outcomes of diagnostic tests, summarizes evidence on how electronic PROM (ePROM) programs can improve patient experience and clinical outcomes, and proposes a practical roadmap for department-level implementation. Throughout, this review aligns recommendations with current methodological and regulatory guidance, draws on Canadian implementation experience, and translates lessons from applied PROM programs in complex clinical services to radiology settings. Implemented thoughtfully, PROMs give radiologists a rigorous, low-burden way to document benefits radiology already provides, strengthen outcome and health-economic analyses, and co-design services around what patients value. Integrating PROMs alongside established technical and diagnostic metrics can extend radiology’s value proposition, and make radiology’s patient-centred impact visible, measurable, and improvable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamran, R., Doria, A. S., & Patlas, M. N. (2026). Measuring What Matters in Radiology: A Guide to Selecting, Implementing, and Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 77(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251387572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free