Evaluation of Common External Communication Concepts of Automated Vehicles for People With Intellectual Disabilities

12Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the future availability of highly automated vehicles (AVs), vulnerable road users (VRUs) will encounter vehicles without human operators. To compensate for the lack of eye contact, realizing communication via external human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) is planned. The adequacy of this regarding people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) is, however, still unknown. This work compares eHMI concepts by their perceived user experience (UX) for people with and without ID to evaluate the inclusiveness of current eHMI concepts. We analyzed related work and derived two representative concepts for a visual and an auditory eHMI. Subsequently, a survey of N = 120 participants (64 with, 56 without ID) was performed, comparing the perceived UX of the selected eHMI concepts for visual, auditory, and combined modalities, and a baseline without eHMI using videos of simulations. We then had them assessed using the modified user experience questionnaire - short (UEQ-S). We found that auditory eHMIs performed worse than visual or multi-modal ones, and multi-modal concepts performed worse for people with ID in terms of pragmatic quality and crossing decisions. Our insights can be taken by both industry and academia, to make AVs more inclusive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haimerl, M., Colley, M., & Riener, A. (2022). Evaluation of Common External Communication Concepts of Automated Vehicles for People With Intellectual Disabilities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(MHCI). https://doi.org/10.1145/3546717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free