I couldn't agree more: The role of conversational structure in agreement and disagreement detection in online discussions

62Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Determining when conversational participants agree or disagree is instrumental for broader conversational analysis; it is necessary, for example, in deciding when a group has reached consensus. In this paper, we describe three main contributions. We show how different aspects of conversational structure can be used to detect agreement and disagreement in discussion forums. In particular, we exploit information about meta-thread structure and accommodation between participants. Second, we demonstrate the impact of the features using 3-way classification, including sentences expressing disagreement, agreement or neither. Finally, we show how to use a naturally occurring data set with labels derived from the sides that participants choose in debates on createdebate.com. The resulting new agreement corpus, Agreement by Create Debaters (ABCD) is 25 times larger than any prior corpus. We demonstrate that using this data enables us to outperform the same system trained on prior existing in-domain smaller annotated datasets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenthal, S., & McKeown, K. (2015). I couldn’t agree more: The role of conversational structure in agreement and disagreement detection in online discussions. In SIGDIAL 2015 - 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 168–177). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w15-4625

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free